How we research and review this content
A quick note on what "reviewed" means on this site: not star ratings from strangers, but a description of the actual process behind every page, so you can judge for yourself how much to trust it.
How a page gets written
For ritual content, such as the puja vidhi, samagri list and katha summary, we cross-check details against multiple publicly available panchang and puja references, rather than relying on a single source or an assumption. Where sources disagree, usually over regional variations, we say so on the page instead of quietly picking one version and presenting it as the only correct one. For the invitation wording, we write and test messages for tone across different relationships, family, friends, colleagues, so the phrasing actually sounds like something a person would send, not a form letter.
How often pages are updated
Every page on this site shows a "last checked" date near the top. Date and muhurat pages get reviewed at least once a year, before the dates they cover become current, and sooner if a reader flags something incorrect. Wording and guide pages get revisited whenever we notice a phrase that reads stiffly or a gap in coverage, such as a category of guest we hadn't accounted for.
Flagging a correction
If a date looks wrong, a samagri item is missing, or a step doesn't match what your family or priest does, we'd like to hear about it. Message us through the support page with the page name and what looks off. We read every message ourselves and aim to review corrections within a few days, though we don't promise a fixed response time for every message.
Why there are no star ratings here
We could add a five-star review widget and populate it, but that would mean either asking real visitors to leave feedback we don't yet have, or fabricating reviews that never happened. We'd rather tell you plainly how the content gets made and let the pages themselves earn your trust.